The best monitors for editing videos: Optimize Your Post-Production
Video editors know how to scrutinize a screen. They require a monitor with 4K resolution, a healthy color gamut, excellent color accuracy, and, ideally, HDR. Only a small number of monitors meet all of these requirements, and even fewer do so at an affordable price. However, a few stand out from the crowd. The best monitors for video editing are these.
Scroll down to read about what you should look for in a video editing monitor.
For much more screen proposals, look at our gathering of the best screens across all classes.
Asus ProArt OLED PA32DC
The best monitor for professionals in video editing is the Asus ProArt OLED PA32DC.
It has the best SDR image quality yet, as well as good HDR performance. It also has a long list of image quality features. Asus ProArt OLED PA32DC. is exceptionally sturdy. It has many inputs, including a USB hub.
If you need a top-tier monitor for video editing, the Asus ProArt PA32DC, which costs $3499, is the best in its class. It will hinder you $3,499 — and it merits each penny
This screen has a 32-inch 4K OLED board that conveys super-sharp video, great variety precision, and covers an extensive variety of expert variety ranges including Rec.2020 and DCI-P3. The OLED board likewise has predominant differentiation and looks perfect in HDR, which is uplifting news assuming that you want to alter HDR content. The HDR quality of the PA32DC is unmatched by any other monitor on this list.
The ProArt PA32DC’s design demonstrates its professional focus. It has a built-in handle and is extremely durable. A pair of screw-on legs that collapse flat can replace the height-adjustable stand that can be taken apart. For a 32-inch monitor, these features may seem odd, but they are great if your job requires you to travel to a client’s worksite or help filmmakers on set.
It also has a lot of connectivity, including five video inputs in total. One is a 65-watt Power Delivery USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode for charging connected devices. The extensive on-screen menu system provides a wide range of image-quality customization options. There is even a built-in colorimeter in the monitor to help with calibration.
Read more on best pc monitor for ps5
Also related: The 6 Best Monitor Brands
The Dell U3223QE
Dell UltraSharp U3223QE 31.5″ 4K UHD WLED LCD
The Dell U3223QE is the best 4K monitor for video editing. This Dell U3223QE is a 32-inch monitor with 4K resolution and an IPS Black display panel. It delivers on its promise of accurate color with a wide gamut, high brightness in SDR, and 90 watts of power. On the downside, the USB-C hub does not have video-out or Ethernet HDR support. Only a small number of monitors use this panel, which has a higher contrast ratio than older IPS panels. The end result is a more realistic and dimensional world. Additionally, the monitor has a high maximum brightness, a wide color gamut, and excellent color accuracy.
HDR is upheld and looks adequate, however the Dell U3223QE is essentially behind the more costly Asus ProArt PA32DC. Alternative monitors, on the other hand, aren’t any better for under $1,000.
Excellent connectivity exists. The monitor has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode and 95 watts of Power Delivery. It also drives a USB-C hub that adds Ethernet, multiple USB-A ports, and DisplayPort-out connectivity.
Video editors who need a more modest screen ought to think about the 27-inch Dell U2723QE. It has nearly the same features as the U3223QE but costs a couple hundred dollars less.
Asus ProArt PA348CGV – Best ultrawide for video altering
ASUS ProArt Display 34” Computer Monitor (PA348CGV)
Masters
Great SDR picture quality
Tough, robust plan
Extensive variety of customization
120Hz invigorate rate
Cons
USB-C center point needs video-out or ethernet
HDR is only acceptable
Best Costs Today:
The Asus ProArt PA348CGV, which costs $649 on Amazon, is a versatile ultrawide monitor that is ideal for video editing and many other tasks.
The ultrawide panel on this monitor is 34 inches, and the resolution is 3440 x 1440. Video editors who must work in 4K may be concerned about the resolution, but very few ultrawide monitors provide a resolution higher than this. The ultrawide screen’s improved multitasking and capacity to display more of a video timeline simultaneously will be appreciated by video editors.
Despite its reasonable price, the ProArt PA348CGV supports up to 98 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut, making it superior to all other monitors on this list in terms of default color accuracy. The contrast ratio of this monitor is lower than that of the Dell U3223QE due to its standard IPS panel, but overall, it competes with Dell’s premium 4K monitor. HDR support is better than Dell’s, making it one of the best options under $1,000.
A wide range of features are added by Asus to sweeten the deal. The monitor has a USB-C port that can charge a connected laptop or tablet with up to 95 watts of Power Delivery. This monitor is suitable for PC gaming thanks to its support for AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz.
The Asus ProArt PA348CGV is cheaper than other ultrawide monitors with comparable performance and features at a MSRP of $749.99. It is ideal for video editors who work from home due to its price and versatility.
Asus ProArt PA279CV – Best financial plan screen for video editing
Accurate picture
High greatest brilliance
Menu settings permit alignment
Has USB-C with 65 watts Power Conveyance
Cutthroat cost
Cons
Unremarkable plan
Luminance consistency could be better
HDR is brilliant however in any case misses the mark
Best Costs Today:
$492.50 at Adorama; Best Buy does not carry it. The current ProArt line from Asus is far superior to most of its rivals, and this is true even when shopping on a budget.
A 27-inch 4K monitor with an IPS panel is this one. The contrast ratio, color accuracy, and maximum brightness of the monitor compete with those of more expensive models on this list. The numerous menu options on the monitor’s screen make it simple for owners to adjust the image quality. Despite the significant price difference, the Dell U3223QE’s out-of-the-box image quality is comparable.
So, the catch is what? Although it handles the entire sRGB color gamut, this monitor does not have a wide color gamut, meaning that it only displays 86% of the DCI-P3 color gamut. The screen’s HDR support is average, as well, however that will be normal given its cost.
For charging a connected device, the ProArt PA279CV has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode and 65 watts of Power Delivery. The USB-C port likewise goes about as a center that stretches out network to four extra USB-A ports. Asus tosses in versatile sync support for smooth interactivity, however the screen doesn’t uphold a revive rate above 60Hz.
This monitor is priced at a competitive $449.99 by Asus. Color accuracy, image customization options, and USB-C support set the Asus PA279CV apart from other affordable alternatives.
Viewsonic ColorPro VP16 OLED
The Viewsonic ColorPro VP16 OLED is the best portable monitor for video editing. Pros include: versatile stands that are useful; included cables and connectivity; numerous image quality customization options; top-notch image quality even at default settings. Negatives include: weak speakers; pricey for a portable monitor; no HDR.
The Viewsonic VP16-OLED is a portable OLED monitor that costs $379.99 on Amazon. It has excellent image quality and a versatile stand.
Video editors will see the value in the screen’s 15.6-inch, 1080p OLED board. With 100% coverage of the sRGB and DCI-P3 color gamuts, as well as 97 percent coverage of AdobeRGB, it delivers on both color accuracy and gamut. This is a great option for video editors who need a portable, accurate display because it outperforms many full-sized OLED monitors and virtually all portable competitors.
The stand
The stand for the monitor is a highlight. It can be expanded to hold the monitor upright or used as a kickstand, both of which improve ergonomics and make it easier to use with a full-sized monitor. The stand has two USB-C ports for power and video input, as well as a micro-HDMI port for devices that do not support USB-C. Viewsonic includes the cables and a USB-C power brick, so you don’t have to buy anything else.
The tripod screw mount on the monitor will also please videographers. With video cameras that support external display connections over HDMI or USB-C, the VP16-OLED can be used as an external display. Viewsonic includes a display hood to reduce glare when using the monitor outdoors or in a brightly lit studio.
The only drawback of the VP16-OLED is that it costs $399.99, which is significantly more than the cost of a basic portable 1080p monitor. Professional video editors who require a portable display with excellent image quality and versatility should consider purchasing the VP16-OLED.
What to look for in a video editing monitor
Video editors, like the majority of people, will appreciate a monitor with excellent image quality; however, the majority of video editors have specific and stringent requirements. Color accuracy, 4K resolution, and HDR support are just a few of the features needed for video editing. What to look for in a monitor for video editing is as follows:
A high level of color accuracy is a must for video editing. Color accuracy is a crucial standard. Video editors are liable for guaranteeing a video looks right when seen on a wide assortment of showcases and that its show fits the style the venture requests. However, working with a monitor whose color is off makes it difficult to evaluate this. A video editor needs to have a high level of color accuracy in order to ensure that the final product looks good.
Fortunately, every monitor on this list has excellent color accuracy. They back it up with a plethora of on-screen menu options that let you customize the color and overall image quality. A video editor can use this to adjust the monitor’s color accuracy and get rid of any small mistakes they find.
video editing is 4K
The gold standard for video editing is 4K. A wide range of video editing projects, from Hollywood films to YouTube videos, use 4K resolution. It is technically possible to edit a video for 4K on a monitor with a resolution below 4K because the majority of video editors will rarely require support for resolutions beyond 4K. This is especially true for less “traditional” content like videos made for social media or YouTube. Nonetheless, 4K is preferred because it provides a 1:1 replica of the final cut.
Although High Dynamic Range (HDR) video is now fairly common, excellent HDR is ideal. HDR content can be displayed on a wide range of devices, from smartphones to laptops and televisions. Because of this, HDR is appealing to video editors. Sadly, excellent HDR monitors are difficult to come by and expensive.
Every one of the screens on this rundown can uphold HDR, which actually implies involving them for HDR video editing is conceivable. On any of the monitors on this list, you should have no trouble editing HDR video for less demanding platforms like YouTube and social media. Notwithstanding, the expensive Asus ProArt PA32DC is the possibly screen on this rundown that holds up assuming you want to ensure splendid, exact HDR results.
A useful feature is USB-C’s development into an excellent video editing-friendly connection option. DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery can both be handled by a single USB-C port. A screen with a USB-C port that upholds these highlights successfully serves as a USB-C. center, decreasing mess on a work area. It is ideal for video editors who frequently travel to remote work sites and edit on laptops that are USB-C compatible.
USB-C port
There is a USB-C port with Power Delivery and DisplayPort Alternate Mode on all of the monitors on this list, though the amount of power and number of downstream ports varies. The Dell U3223QE is the best option for connectivity because it has multiple USB-A ports, ethernet, and DisplayPort out.
How we test monitors PCWorld employs staff writers and freelance writers to write monitor reviews. Screens are tried with the SpyderXElite variety alignment instrument to dispassionately quantify brilliance, contrast, variety range, and variety precision, among different measurements. We can directly compare dozens of monitors at once with objective measurements.
Our testing likewise represents extraordinary elements that might give a screen a benefit. A USB-C center with broad network and Power Conveyance is dependably ideal. We also like ergonomic stands, a lot of video inputs, a lot of options in the menu on the screen, and HDR support.
FAQ
What makes a screen great for video altering?
A good monitor for video editing should support the full sRGB color gamut, have a high maximum brightness, have an acceptable contrast ratio, and have 4K resolution. Premium video altering screens ought to toss in a wide variety range, fantastic network, predominant differentiation, and HDR.
What is the best goal for video altering?
The standard is 4K. Essentially all video editors will work with 4K substance sooner or later, and many work in 4K only. Even in professional Hollywood and streaming workflows, working at a resolution higher than 4K is uncommon.
Is HDR required for video editing?
That depends on whether you intend to edit HDR-enabled projects. HDR can be easily abandoned by creators working on YouTube and other online platforms: Most viewers won’t be bothered.
However, if you work as a video editor and have clients who require HDR content, you will need a monitor that can display it correctly.
Is video editing possible on an ultrawide monitor?
Although they can be useful for video editing, ultrawide monitors are not always superior to widescreen displays. If you’re working on big video edits with a lot of extra content added to the timeline, going ultrawide is helpful. When editing a project in an ultrawide aspect ratio, they may also be preferable.
However, the lack of support for 4K resolution on the majority of ultrawide monitors could be a problem. Ultrawide also doesn’t fit well in portrait video, which is especially bad for widescreen content: an interesting circumstance, maybe, yet one that is turning out to be more normal as TikTok and YouTube Shorts gain prominence.